* A medium-sized ax with two-and-a-half pound head. Small enough to carry, but big enough to be useful. (That weight is recommended in Ellsworth Jaeger's Wildwood Wisdom, which looks like a book for teenagers but is actually far more than that.) About $30.
* A Rappala all-in-one fishing kit, the whole thing in a plastic package. The rod is take-apart, so it's easy to carry in a car or knapsack. I'd go for a spinning (open) reel, not any other kind. Also looks like kid stuff, but might do better than a stick, a string, and a bent nail. Also about $30.
All of the above, including the fishing kit and the ax, would fit in (or on) my best backpack, from Mountain Equipment Co-op (well over $100 when I bought it many years ago). I might stop at Canadian Tire some other day also. But I must avoid the common myth that a true "survivalist" is the one who has thousands of dollars of high-tech gear but no real knowledge to go with it.
-- After the initial day of Peter's Ten-Minute Survival Window Shopping Program (PTMSWSP), I realized that all the things I have, plus the two things from Canadian Tire, might fit in, on, or under my knapsack, but my knees would buckle after walking two steps. Interesting.
So that leads to the question of the famous bug-out kit everyone talks about. Seems to me that in summer a great deal could be left behind, but then what do you do as winter approaches and you have no winter sleeping bag and so on?
In any case, it also seems that a bug-out kit that takes the form of a box or bag is only of use if you're planning to build a log cabin or something right where you've parked the car. Then why not put up a sign saying "Please Rob Me"? Whereas if you intend to leave the car behind and head off on a less-traveled path, you'll have to rely on a very good backpack and the (relatively) little that it would hold. I know the old story of the Indian woman who escaped from enemies and spent the winter making a shelter, traps, etc. with only a knife, but I personally don't think I'd last more than five minutes in a snowstorm, without a good deal of modern equipment. Well, OK, in a snowstorm I'd start by getting under the snow, not over it -- I've built some nice snow shelters over the years. So maybe I'd survive.
Moral of the story? Instead of focusing so much on a bug-out kit, maybe build a cache, storing what you need in some way that everything would be hidden and protected from human and animal thieves, for years if necessary.
In my near-north days I bought some old crosscut saws, all of them well over four or five feet long, cleaned off the rust as much as possible, and tried sawing. I was defeated to some extent because I couldn't get rid of the pitting. I finally learned that Lehman's (on-line) sells brand-new timber saws, and that they're said to cut much faster than a bow (Swede) saw, at least if they're oiled before use. I meant to order one, but then I ended up in Oman for three years (from which I am still recovering, mentally and otherwise). But I hope one day I can get one of those new crosscut saws.
Somebody mentioned that, instead of thinking so much in terms of backpacks or bug-out kits, using a canoe might be a good idea, because canoes can go where cars cannot, and because they can be paddled, carried, or dragged. I've always liked canoes myself. Good thinking. And I agree that canoes can go where other things can't. In fact there are many rivers or streams where canoes can go but a motorboat wouldn't have room, in terms of either depth or width. Certainly you're not likely to be followed.
One dilemma I have at the moment, though, is that the cheap land is all on the East Coast (more like latitude 45 than 49), and the land there is also good farming land. There are a few catches. One is that it's a fair distance from my present neck of the woods (in Ontario), so not suitable for weekend visits. The other is that the East Coast has terrible poverty (not mentioned on TV), which in turn means a high crime rate. In Nova Scotia, when I was there, it seemed people made a living largely from marijuana-growing and from deer-poaching. (Been following some other people who also moved out there recently.) Most of Ontario is just rock, on the other hand, but hunting and fishing would be possibilities, at least north of Kapuskasing, Cochrane, and Cobalt, which are OK if you like eight months of winter. So there are pros and cons of everywhere.
I've heard that the high prices of property in Canada are due to the high immigration rate, causing competition for whatever is available. So there's a curious bit of tension likely to build up for that reason. In addition, if the Energy East pipeline goes through to New Brunswick, that might create jobs and reduce poverty there, but also increase the price of land. Some big unknowns. Of course, that leads to the bigger question of whether in an Apocalyptic moment it would be worth the bother to be buying or owning land. Maybe the smart ones would be squatting, to use a good UK English word.
Someone questioned my mention of a .22 that's merely single-shot. Such a gun is lightweight, and simple enough not to go wrong. For hunting it's fine -- if you can't hit something with the first shot, you're doing something wrong. But for self-defense, I admit, a single-shot .22 is questionable, especially if the bad guys have something more advanced.